3 new ASI cameras has come: ASI224MC ASI185MC ASI178MC. This cameras have Low Noise, High Sensitivity and Fast Speed.
These cameras are the best planetary imaging camera in the world and the cooled version won’t be far away 😉
For more info and orders please visit products pages.
Things you need to know about photographing the Solar Eclipse. A total solar eclipse is a spectacular and mysterious astronomical event in nature, not only sparking curiosity about the universe
The total solar eclipse in April 2024 is just around the corner. According to NASA, the next visible total solar eclipse to cross over the U.S. after April will come
Hello Jan, thanks for accepting our interview invitation. Congratulations on winning the ASIWEEK competition in week #23/2024! Q1: At first, congratulation that your nice image won #ASIWEEK. Can you introduce
Hello Simone, thanks for accepting our interview invitation. Congratulations on winning the ASIWEEK competition in week #19/2024! Q1: At first, congratulation that your nice image won #ASIWEEK. Can you introduce
The South Pole stands as one of Earth’s most enigmatic realms, where mesmerizing auroras dance across the sky, vast expanses of icy terrain stretch as far as the eye can
70 Comments
Daniel Brousseau
Sam,
Is it possible to have the best of two worlds, planetary and deepsky camera with the cooled monochrome 174 ?
Does the cooled one can keep a fast frames/sec. ?
Thanks,
Sam Wen
yes, cooled camera will have the same fps
the best of the two worlds, that’s our goal!
Peter Branson
Hello Sam,
I’m a very keen astro-photographer and I take pictures of DSOs as well as the Moon and planets. I already have a very good ATIK camera for deep sky stuff and I would like a newer camera for the Moon and planets. I’m thinking of buying the ZWO ASI224MC-Cool. Will it run on my HP Pavilion g series laptop running Windows 7. If I stick with the USB2 links what effect will this have on download speeds and video rates?
Sam Wen
I think maybe ASI174MC-Cool or ASI178MC-Cool is better if you need an all in one camera
the sensor of 224 is still a little small for DSO and solar or lunar imaging
USB2.0 will limit the download speed, maybe you are right to choose 224 if you stick to usb2.0
the speed of 224 only drop to half if connect to 2.0 port, but 174 and 178 is far faster than 224
Greg
I currently have a 120MC-S , and an 8SE celestron. I have a USB 3 port on my computer. I want to know which of these cameras is the best for planetary images? The ASI224MC ASI185MC or ASI178MC.
I do not really understand a lot of the specifications. I currently use a 2X barlow when I take images with the 224mc
Thank you,
Greg
Sam Wen
Hi Greg
I think 224 is the best planetary imaging color camera
but 185 and 178 is better for lunar and solar imaging because they have a larger sensor
Sanjiv
Hi Sam
I would liKe to Know if the 178MC-cool can be used for high resolution pictures instead of just videos. One vendor informed me that the camera is more for video, and that I can get stills by screen capture. I am interested in imaging DSOs using 80 mm F/6 scope. My current DSLR is a bit noisy, and I would liKe to try a cooled camera.
ThanKs
Sam Wen
yes, it can be used for high resolution imaging through our ASCOM driver
jyj1023
Hello Sam
I odered 178Mc just few minutes ago.
I’m very expecting fot this product to take photos for moon & planets.
Thank you.
Eugene from S. Korea
Sam Wen
yes, this is a very good camera for moon and planets
Perry
Hello Sam,
I am new to astrophotography am looking for a all in on color camera that will mostly be used for dso photography. I’ve read and compared the specs on multiple cameras and I’m leaning towards the 185MC but I have not been able to find many photos taken with the 185MC or any reviews on it. What is your recommendation?
Sam Wen
the amp-glow of 185 is larger than others, so not very suitable for dso imaging
you’d better pick up our newest ASI1600
Didier
Dear Sam,
Though I am a proud owner of an AS120MC, I would like to upgrade to your best solution for Sun, Moon, planetary and DSO. I have a Tak TSA102 and a Mewlon 250.
What would you recommend?
Sam Wen
I think you can consider ASI290MC, higher resolution, lower read noise, faster fps
you can also consider ASI1600 if you need a more DSO imaging camera
Terry
I am very very new to astrophotography….my computer is a MAC…which camera do you recommend..which one is a good one to learn and is very easy to use. thank you!
Sam Wen
all our USB3.0 cameras are suggested
maybe you can start from ASI224MC which is the best color planetary cam
steve
Hey Stan,
I am looking for a low noise DSO camera for under 500 bucks..I am having trouble deciding which of your ZWO’S will fit the bill.After reading through the above I have ruled out the 85,the 1600 is out of my price range and I am looking at the 178 non cooled..Is the best for me or would you reccomend another? also will no cooling have a major effect? Also looked at some in the 120 series.My fate is in your hands..lol..
thanks
Steve
Sam Wen
I think maybe 178 is the best suitable for you
high resolution and l/1.8″format
David
Hello Sam
Could you please tell me which camera would best suit my set of a Skywatcher ED100 f9 refractor. I would like to get into planetary, lunar and solar imaging.
Thank you
Regards
David
Sam Wen
I think you can use ASI224MC or ASI185MC if you more prefer to lunar or solar imaging
Laszlo Sturmann
Hello Sam,
Is there a liquid cooled version in the works?
Think of prime focus imaging and those jets of warm air from the heat sink.
Thanks,
Laszlo
Sam Wen
no, we don’t have plan for such version
Geoff
Can a usb3 camera still be used with a laptop that only has Usb 2 ports ?
Sam Wen
yes, just slower speed
Mark
I have an 8″ Edge HD SCT. Would the 1600 be the best all around camera for DSO and Planetary? Thanks.
Sam Wen
yes, but you need barlow for planetary imaging and reducer for DSO imaging
Ronnie Miller
I’m looking at buying a new” STRICTLY” DSO camera to use in my 8 inch Newtonian astrograph with TV Paracoor type 2, I’e got a new i5 with usb3 ports and an older hp 2000 w usb2 that I use for my planetary cams. Which would better suit my needs ? My DSI lll color just bit the dust and I’ve spent weeks trying to decide which would be the better fit for my newt.
Sam Wen
I think the new i5 would be better
Jeff
Hi Sam,
I already have an ASI 224MC and I’ve just ordered an ASI 178MC for DSO Imaging. Could you please confirm that the 178MC comes with an IR block window ?
If yes, is it easy to replace by an AR one ? Which diameter (D21 or D25)?
Thanks a lot.
JF
Sam Wen
yes, 178MC come with IR-CUT window, you can replace the AR D21 window
Doug Palmer
Sam,
I am looking to do DSO and also some planetary imagery. I will be using an F/6 80mm APO refractor with a .8 fr/ff. I am considering getting an ASI224 for guiding when doing DSO and an ASI478 for the DSO itself. I was considering having the ASI224 double as a planetary camera without guiding. I am thinking I should get the cooled version of the ASI478 but the ASI224 probably doesn’t need to be cooled. Am I thinking correctly and have I chosen the best cameras for my application? Also, can I get equally as good results with a OSC or should I plan to get the MC cameras for one or both?
Thank you for considering my questions!
Best Regards and Merry Christmas,
Doug
Doug Palmer
By MC I meant MonoChrome. Probably should have said just said mono.
Sam Wen
Merry Christmas Doug, you don’t need one cooled camera for planetary imaging or guiding
actually, I would recommend our new ASI1600 or ASI071 for DSO imaging
you can use 224mc for guiding or planetary imaging
Mathew Maskas
I want to match a camera to a telescope. I want your suggestion for an imaging scope and an opinion on my scope selection method. I am starting by matching the resolution of the camera to the resolution of the scope. Thinking, why have a camera with lower resolution than the telescope. Example, the scope resolution having an 89 mm aperture, using Dawes law is 1.3 arc-sec and a focal length of 600 mm would make the camera resolution of 1.31 arc-sec/pixel using a pixel size of 3.8 um. If seeing equals 4 arc-sec, then the FWHM would be 3 pixels. Do most astronomy photographers operate in the FWHM range of 2-3 pixels? Now, the field of view (FOV) for the ASI1600 is 101 and 76 arc-minutes. This FOV is good for some of the messier objects M8 and smaller. But, what about the smaller objects like M57. Do I use a reducer or can I change resolution on the camera from 4656 x 3520 to 320 x 240 (FOV 6 x 5 arc-minutes). Lastly, how do I know that the image size of the scope is bigger than the camera sensor size when adding a reducer/flatterer or barlow? Thanks for your help in advance. Mathew Maskas
Sam Wen
your calculation is correct, most user have 2-3 arc-set/pixel seeing
but you can shorter the exposure time to freezing seeing
so for M57, you can exposure 1s and use a barlow lens
Tony Anthony
Hey Sam,
Point blank….
I have both a 8″ Meade LX200GPS and a Meade ETX 125 and want to start shooting some images of solar system and deep sky objects.
I know there is no perfect cam for either of these scopes, but could you possibly point me in the right direction for choosing one of your excellent cameras to help me persue this new hobby?
The new ASI290MC was recommended by a friend.
Your recommndations would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Tony
Sam Wen
I think ASI224 or ASI290 should be ok both
Mathew Maskas
Hello Sam,
I have more questions about using a color camera ( ASI071). To obtain good color one needs to bloat over 4 pixels. I did some math to determine what focal length and aperture size is needed when the image size is 4 pixels. Example: If the FWHM is 4 pixels or 4 * 4.78 = 19.12 um and the seeing is 2” then the required focal length is ( star size * 206.265 ) / seeing = (19.12 * 206.265)/2 = 1971 mm. That would give me a pixel scale of ( 206.265 * 4.78 )/1971 = 0.5 arc-sec / pixel. Then the resolution requirement of the telescope would be the same. Then the aperture size would be 116/0.5 = 232 mm. The size limit of my objects in the sky would be 27 arc-minutes keeping a bloat over 4 pixels. What do I do to image larger objects and bloat enough pixel to get good color? Is this a limitation of a color camera? Thanks, Mathew Maskas
Sam Wen
calculation cannot replace practice, I don’t think it need to to bloat over 4pixels
AndreaB
I have the Celestron 8″ SCT with Advanced VX mount and don’t have a camera yet. I’m planning on purchasing a Coronado Solarmax 60 to prepare for the Total Eclipse in August. I know I’ll be with friends for the Total Eclipse in Sourth Carolina and would like to possibly video the output of the solar scope to my laptop and I’m assuming capture too. (It has USB 3.0, so ok there). I’d like to be able to image the whole Sun and also be able to use it for imaging planets and maybe some DSO (but not a priority). What would you suggest? I’d like to keep it under $500, but might go higher. thanks!
Sam Wen
I think you can use ASI174 which is most suitable for solar imaging
Fabrizio
Dear Sam,
so far I have used with great satisfaction the ASI120MC, but the moment to go beyond has come…
In the last year I am become fool for astrophotography of DSO, while remaining still a “fan” of planetary (not so much for the moon and the sun …)
Never change a winning team! And then I would buy a new camera for this: DSO and planetary. I use a good reflector 200/1000.
I am evaluating ASI185 ASI178 cooled! The budget is $700 but I can possibly push this budget to $ 900-1000 for ASI174 cool.
Which is the best camera for my purposes?
Color or Mono?
Sam Wen
mono camera have more fun to play with, but color camera is easier to use
I think you can consider ASI1600MC-Cool
Grant Hiestand
I’m looking at purchasing a Lunt 50Tha telescope, and would like to know which camera would be best for high resolution solar imaging: the 174 or 178 sensor.
Sam Wen
174 is the best for luar imaging
To tie
What is the best camera for live video astronomy? I have a 6″ celestron evolution and I observe DSO most of the time.
Sam Wen
I think 224 is the best color and 290 is the best mono
Observant
Thinking about upgrading to a MacBook Pro and buying a camera for planetary imaging to use with an Orion Starmax 127mm F12 Maksutov and a Astro-Physics Star155ED (f9) refractor. It sounds like the 224 may be the best choice for this purpose.
Sam Wen
yes, you can use ASI224
Dave martin
Getting back into imaging after a long break, at present i own a Atik 383L, and a canon d60a
I’m looking for a camera for Lunar and planetary to sit on my Celestron 11HD, can you please advise
Sam Wen
maybe color is better, how about ASI290MC
High resolution and sensitive enough
Carlos
Hello
I have a celestron C11 xlt and Mac computer.
I would like to have a guide cam and a photo cam
What are your suggestions?
Thank you
Sam Wen
you can choose ASI290MM or ASI174MM
mono camera is better for guiding
Andrew D.
I have a similar question to many… I have a C11 Edge HD and want the absolute best planetary camera. Saturn, Jupiter and Mars are the primary targets… (also some lunar work as well.)
Along with my scope I have both a 2X & 4X Power Mate lens for magnification.
1.) Is the ASI290 the best camera for me?
2.) Mono or OSC?
3.) Cooled or not?
Thank you!
Sean Wang
Yes, 290 is best for you. 290mm is mono camera and 290mc is color. we have both cooled version and uncooled version. I think if you using it in planetary imaging, uncooled version is suitable.
Kirby Price
I’m looking for a camera to use with both an 80mm refractor and Celestron 8″ Edge HD. I am interested in both planetary and some DSO work, but at this time I am really only getting started. I am looking at the 174, 178 and 1600 versions, both cooled and uncooled.
I live in Canada, so when imaging in the winter(-20C is my lower limit) , temperature would most likely not be an issue. If the exposures are kept low (a couple minutes or less) is cooling really needed. If I go without cooling I can go for a larger sensor, which could probably provide better images. I know there is no perfect solution for every situation, and an 80 mm is very different than an 8″SCT, but I only want 1 camera. I am willing to accept that it will be somewhat of a compromise for both applications. As well, I am ok to spend the money to get a good camera, but would prefer to not spend more than I need to.
Sean Wang
eviroment temperature is not like the cooling temperature, it is not stay in a same level, so the image can not have same noise level.
I suggest using cooled camera even you have a very cold winter.
Marc West
Hi Sam,
I have had in the past early cameras from Meade. I recently bought a Solarmax II 60MM double stack telescope, I also have a Meade 8″ SCT.
I have been looking at the ASI185MC and it seems to be a good (in terms of number of stars reviewed below) as an all rounder for both Solar, Lunar, Planetary and Deep Space…
I saw this table on http://agenaastro.com/zwo-astronomy-cameras-buyers-guide.html I am not sure if this is accurate?
I am mainly watching Solar, Lunar and Planets, however want to get into deep space.
Based upon my two telescopes, which camera would you recommend, and is there a huge difference for solar and planetart between then ASI185MC and cooled?
Many thanks Marc
Sean Wang
In solar and planetary imaging, there is no different bewteen ASI185MC and cooled version.
I think if you already have 185mc, it will not necessary to purchase another camera for now.
Marc West
Sean,
I am not sure why you think I have the 185mc, however I think you answered the question.
However you didnt answer whether the Table is accurate and you didnt say whether the 185mc is a good alround Camera?
Also at what point is cooled more useful?
Thanks
Sam Wen
maybe you should consider ASI224 or ASI290
185 has heavy amp-glow compare with 224 OR 290
so it’s not very suitable for very long time exposure
Marc West
Thanks Sam,
I notice that what ever questions I ask I am only getting a partial answer, So I will ask the full questions again.
1. Which camera is best for the following uses in this order:
Solar primary use
Planetary secondary use
DSO third
2. The link to the ZWO table how accurate is it?
http://agenaastro.com/zwo-astronomy-cameras-buyers-guide.html
3. If my main use is Solar and Planetary do I need cooled?
Marc West
also do I need a ZWO T2 Tilter for ASI Imaging Cameras for my SolarMax II 60MM
Sam Wen
you’d better add it in case suffering from newton ring problem
Clayton
Hi Sam,
I just purchased the Celestron 1100 Edge HD and the CGX-L mount. Since I am an avid terrestrial photographer, I’m sure I will eventually want to try AP. I was thinking in the future (near future) I might purchase the ASI224MC to start practicing planetary and lunar photography. However, in a comment up above, you suggested to someone in a similar situation that the ASI290 would be the one to buy. Why is that?
Sean Wang
290 have mono version, mono camera have better performance than color cameras. And 290 have higher resolution than 224, that’s another reason. But it is not means 224 is not good at planetary imaging. We only say that 290 is better.
Clayton
Thanks for replying. So if it has a higher resolution, does that mean the 290 color would be better than the 224 color …. if I opted to not go with the mono, that is?
Sam Wen
yes, such like imaging the moon
Jon
Hi Sam,
I see that the ASI 1600 now has a buffer to help prevent amp glow using a USB2 interface. I had amp glow on my ASI 174 using USB2 or USB3 .
I want to get a replacement for the 174 and am looking at the 290, 178 and 1600. I want to be able to shoot DSO, and planets but, I don’t want to deal with amp glow on long exposures. Is there any plan for a buffer on the 174, 290 and 178 cameras or should I just get the 1600 for deep sky and use ROI for planets?
Jon
Sam Wen
no, the 1600 is designed for dso imaging and a buffer can help to reduce amp-glow caused by long time transfer
but 174 or 290 won’t have such problem because the total pixels is only 2M and can be transferred to PC very quickly